Argument against the case an accounting standard to regulate the way in which complex financial instruments are reported in the financial statements of quoted companies
Title: Argument against the case an accounting standard to regulate the way in which complex financial instruments are reported in the financial statements of quoted companies
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 2355 | Pages: 9 (approximately 235 words/page)
Argument against the case an accounting standard to regulate the way in which complex financial instruments are reported in the financial statements of quoted companies
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 2355 | Pages: 9 (approximately 235 words/page)
INTRODUCTION :
In this essay, I would like to start with a brief explanation about the accounting regulation and standards set for various treatments consists of gaps where the rules are vague or even incomplete. Then, I would like to give a brief introduction about the development of standards set for capital instrument, such as TR677 (ICAEW), FRED 3 and FRS 4.
Next, I will go into details examining the problems found in these proposals and standard, especially …showed first 75 words of 2355 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 2355 total…Andrew Marshall, and Tony Puxty, (1991), 'NFIs: Treatment and Disclosure', Accountancy, January, pp. 66-67
Atul K. Shah, (1997), Regulatory Arbitrage Through Financial Innovation', Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 85-104
Andrew Lennard, (1992), 'Debt, equity or something else?' Accountancy
Chris Westwich, (1994), 'What is the profit on repurchase of debt?' Accountancy, June, pp. 124-125
Barry Johnson, (1994), 'Practical Problems With FRS 4', Accountancy, June, pp. 124-125
Roger Wood, (1993), 'A View From the Broadroom', Accountancy, July, pp. 96-97
