Compare and contrast the assumptions, if any, which classical elitists, pluralists and rational choice theorists bring to the analysis and explanation of politics.
Title: Compare and contrast the assumptions, if any, which classical elitists, pluralists and rational choice theorists bring to the analysis and explanation of politics.
Category: /Social Sciences/Politics
Details: Words: 2119 | Pages: 8 (approximately 235 words/page)
Compare and contrast the assumptions, if any, which classical elitists, pluralists and rational choice theorists bring to the analysis and explanation of politics.
Category: /Social Sciences/Politics
Details: Words: 2119 | Pages: 8 (approximately 235 words/page)
Abstract
With regard to the study of politics, this essay will attempt to define elitism, citing the major founders of the discipline. Pluralism and rational choice theory will also be discussed in turn, with particular attention to the main assumptions involved in the application of the theories. All three disciplines will be criticised and compared on any assumptions that seem to differ or oppose each other. A conclusion will be made, summing up the merits …showed first 75 words of 2119 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 2119 total…and usefulness for political science' from The Economic Approach to Politics (New York, Harper-Collins).
Mosca, G. (1896/1965) 'The Ruling Class' from The Ruling Class (New York).
Pareto, V. (1915/1919: 1966) 'Residues and elites' from Sociological Writings (London).
Smith, M. J. (1990) 'Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neo Pluralism: the role of pressure groups on policy-making' from Political Studies, volume 38 pp. 302-322.
Lecture Notes, The University of York Department of Politics, Module no. 2110002 (Politics B, The World of Politics) Autumn Term 2003.
