Compare critically Bentham's, Hart's and Dworkin's accounts of legal obligation. The essay is submitted for the course "Jurisprudence"
Title: Compare critically Bentham's, Hart's and Dworkin's accounts of legal obligation. The essay is submitted for the course "Jurisprudence"
Category: /Social Sciences/Philosophy
Details: Words: 3064 | Pages: 11 (approximately 235 words/page)
Compare critically Bentham's, Hart's and Dworkin's accounts of legal obligation. The essay is submitted for the course "Jurisprudence"
Category: /Social Sciences/Philosophy
Details: Words: 3064 | Pages: 11 (approximately 235 words/page)
Legal obligation is both Bentham's and Hart's central concern. Yet, Dworkin does not really make an account on this topic, but rather criticising positivist theses. Thus, I will first make a brief summary of Bentham's and Hart's account of legal obligation, before I make a comparison of all the three jurists' theories.
Jeremy Bentham's Legal Obligation
For Bentham, obligation is the opposite of rights. Obligations and rights are the two classes of things that the …showed first 75 words of 3064 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 3064 total…amp; Sons, 1985)
Dworkin, Ronald, Law's Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977)
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961)
Bentham, Jeremy, Jeremy's Labyrinth: A Bentham Hypertext (http://www.la.utexas.edu/research/poltheory/bentham/), from Classical Utilitarianism Website (http://www.la.utexas.edu/cuws/index.html) (University of Texas at Austin). All Bentham's works cited in this essay, unless otherwise stated, are taken from this website.
