Do you agree that "being religious in itself is not a necessary qualification for a student of religion?"
Title: Do you agree that "being religious in itself is not a necessary qualification for a student of religion?"
Category: /Social Sciences/Language & Speech
Details: Words: 758 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Do you agree that "being religious in itself is not a necessary qualification for a student of religion?"
Category: /Social Sciences/Language & Speech
Details: Words: 758 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
<Tab/>I agree that 'being religious in itself is not a necessary qualification for a student of religion.' From the examples that follow, we will see why it is not a necessary qualification. However, we will also consider the argument of those who disagree with the above statement.
<Tab/>Being religious in itself is not a necessary qualification for a student of religion just as how
showed first 75 words of 758 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 758 total
a student of religion, and if we were to apply this to any other subject matter, the number of students taking on subjects in schools will dramatically be reduced. Children will never have a change to be exposed to learning and only the exceptional few intelligent ones will be allowed to study. Many of us who practice a certain religion were not very religious, and as a result of that we become student of religion.