FreeBDS vs Linux , promoting Nathan Boeger
Title: FreeBDS vs Linux , promoting Nathan Boeger
Category: /Recreation & Sports/Outdoors
Details: Words: 792 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
FreeBDS vs Linux , promoting Nathan Boeger
Category: /Recreation & Sports/Outdoors
Details: Words: 792 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Reliability
FreeBSD
FreeBSD is extremely robust. There are numerous testimonials of active servers with uptimes measured in years. The new Soft Updates file system optimizes disk I/O for high performance, yet still ensures reliability for transaction based applications, such as databases.
Linux
Linux is well known for its reliability. Servers often stay up for years. However, disk I/O is non-synchronous by default, which is less reliable for transaction based operations, and can produce
showed first 75 words of 792 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 792 total
in development for Linux that will fix some of these issues, but these will not be ready for the 2.4 release of Linux.
Conclusion:
Using the above parameters we can see that FreeBSD is superior top Linux for the Business community or better said to the Production env, although Linux according to the specific info is less powerful it's still a great OS that leaves Windows in the shadows.
Bibliography
http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/01/infrrevu/