Prices for Custom Writing
within 5 days $17.95 per page within 3 days $19.95 per page within 48 hours $21.95 per page within 24 hours $25.95 per page within 12 hours $29.95 per page within 6 hours $38.95 per page
Service Features
  • Original and quality writing
  • 24/7 qualified support
  • Lifetime discounts
  • 300 words/page
  • Double-spaced, 12 pt. Arial
  • Any writing format
  • Any topic
  • Fully referenced
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Free title page
  • Free outline
  • Free bibliography
  • Free unlimited revisions
Affordable Student Services

Sign-up for over 800,000 original essays & term papers

Buy original essay on any topic

How successful is Article 62 of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties 1969 in dealing with the termination of treaties on the grounds of fundamental change of circumstances?

Title: How successful is Article 62 of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties 1969 in dealing with the termination of treaties on the grounds of fundamental change of circumstances?
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 2641 | Pages: 10 (approximately 235 words/page)
How successful is Article 62 of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties 1969 in dealing with the termination of treaties on the grounds of fundamental change of circumstances?
The doctrine of fundamental change of circumstances, (rebus sic stantibus) is a principle of customary international law allowing a part to an agreement to withdraw or terminate it where there has been a fundamental change in circumstances. The main justification for this principle is that treaties often remain in force for many years, during which time fundamental changes may occur in the political or international environment which may require a departure from the provisions set …showed first 75 words of 2641 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 2641 total…states from testing the legitimacy of their decision to terminate a treaty on the basis of Article 62 before the ICJ, as will probably occur in the ABM Treaty debate. Perhaps an alternative solution would be to not only use Article 62 as a method of upholding or terminating treaties; but more flexibly as a process for initiating renegotiation or modification of a treaty whose object and purpose no longer correspond to the needs of changed circumstances.

Need a custom written paper?

Buy a custom written essay and get 20% OFF the first order