Prices for Custom Writing
within 5 days $17.95 per page within 3 days $19.95 per page within 48 hours $21.95 per page within 24 hours $25.95 per page within 12 hours $29.95 per page within 6 hours $38.95 per page
Service Features
  • Original and quality writing
  • 24/7 qualified support
  • Lifetime discounts
  • 300 words/page
  • Double-spaced, 12 pt. Arial
  • Any writing format
  • Any topic
  • Fully referenced
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Free title page
  • Free outline
  • Free bibliography
  • Free unlimited revisions
Affordable Student Services

Sign-up for over 800,000 original essays & term papers

Buy original essay on any topic

Triumph of Privacy: Kyllo v. United States (2001) Analyze majority and minority opinions of the case, give your own opinion, and discuss implications for future privacy rights.

Title: Triumph of Privacy: Kyllo v. United States (2001) Analyze majority and minority opinions of the case, give your own opinion, and discuss implications for future privacy rights.
Category: /Society & Culture/Education
Details: Words: 1927 | Pages: 7 (approximately 235 words/page)
Triumph of Privacy: Kyllo v. United States (2001) Analyze majority and minority opinions of the case, give your own opinion, and discuss implications for future privacy rights.
Triumph of Privacy One of the most important additions to the United States Constitution is the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights contains our fundamental civil liberties, which guarantees citizens individual rights against intrusions by both the federal and state government. The perception that human beings have inalienable rights and liberties that cannot be violated is not new. Philosophers like Socrates and Locke all preached about the importance of individual rights. This belief still …showed first 75 words of 1927 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 1927 total…the defendant's home constituted a "search" for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment and was presumptively unreasonable without a warrant. The Court placed great weight on the fact that the device was new, "not in general public use," and had been used to "explore details of a private home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion." Thankfully the sanctity of the home was reaffirmed and prying eyes covered with a blindfold of justice.

Need a custom written paper?

Buy a custom written essay and get 20% OFF the first order